Operational Planning

Strategic Planning helps people clarify purpose, choose direction, and establish priorities.

Operational Planning considers what those priorities require in practice: the work to be done, the people involved, the resources and authority needed, and the ways progress will be reviewed.

The two are closely connected. Operational experience may also reveal that a strategic assumption or priority needs reconsideration.

Not necessarily. We can begin with established priorities, a particular project, an organizational challenge, or a decision that needs to be carried into action.

Where direction is unclear or competing priorities remain unresolved, we may recommend clarifying those questions before developing detailed plans.

Usually, a practical account of what needs to happen, who is responsible, what resources and authority are required, and how progress will be assessed.

This may include action plans, timelines, responsibility agreements, simple tracking tools, and arrangements for regular review. We aim to develop materials people can use, rather than documents that create unnecessary work.

Accountability matters, and so do the conditions in which people are expected to deliver.

We help clarify responsibilities, decision-making authority, and expectations while paying attention to available time, resources, competing demands, and the people affected by the work.

Sometimes an honest assessment reveals that the plan itself needs to change. We would rather help people recognize that early than leave them responsible for commitments they cannot reasonably fulfil.

We encourage timely conversations about what is happening, what has changed, and what people are learning.

Sometimes a change in timing, responsibilities, or resources is sufficient. Sometimes the difficulty reveals an assumption, relationship, or organizational practice that deserves closer attention.

A useful operational plan helps people recognize these signals and respond thoughtfully rather than simply report that they are behind schedule.

Yes. Depending on your needs, we can remain involved through progress reviews, facilitated conversations, coaching, and adjustments to the plan.

The day-to-day decisions and responsibilities remain with your people, while we offer perspective, encouragement, and honest challenge along the way.

Yes. We work in person and virtually, through live planning sessions and conversations, as well as reflection, review, and other activities between meetings.

We agree on a format that serves the people involved and the work to be accomplished.

That depends on the scope of the work, the people involved, the clarity of existing priorities, and the level of planning support required.

After an initial conversation, we can propose an approach, timeline, and fee for consideration.

• Babcock, L., Peyser, B., Vesterlund, L., & Weingart, L. R. (2022). The no club: Putting a stop to women’s dead-end work. Simon & Schuster.
• Gawande, A. (2009). The checklist manifesto: How to get things right. Metropolitan Books.
• Goldratt, E. M., & Cox, J. (2014). The goal: A process of ongoing improvement (4th rev. ed.). North River Press.
• McChesney, C., Covey, S., Huling, J., Thele, S., & Walker, B. (2021). The 4 disciplines of execution: Achieving your wildly important goals (Rev. & updated 2nd ed.). Simon & Schuster.
• Moss, J. (2021). The burnout epidemic: The rise of chronic stress and how we can fix it. Harvard Business Review Press.
• Project Management Institute. (2025). A guide to the project management body of knowledge (PMBOK® guide) and the standard for project management (8th ed.).
• Schwaber, K., & Sutherland, J. (2020). The Scrum guide: The definitive guide to Scrum: The rules of the game. Scrum Guides. https://scrumguides.org/docs/scrumguide/v2020/2020-Scrum-Guide-US.pdf
• Sutton, R. I., & Rao, H. (2024). The friction project: How smart leaders make the right things easier and the wrong things harder. St. Martin’s Press.

Browse our resource recommendations